|
|
The doctrine of Justification
by Faith,
through the Imputation
of the Righteousness of Christ
– Explained, Confirmed,
and Vindicated
Dr. John Owen
(1616-1683)
To the Reader
I shall not need to detain the reader
with an account of the nature and
moment of that doctrine which is the
entire subject of the ensuing
discourse; far although sunder persons,
even among ourselves, have
various apprehensions concerning it,
yet that the knowledge of the truth
therein is of the highest importance
unto the souls of men is on all
hands agreed unto. Nor, indeed, is
it possible that any man who knows
himself to be a sinner, and obnoxious
thereon to the judgment of God, but
he must desire to have some knowledge
of it, as that alone whereby the
way of delivery from the evil state
and condition wherein he finds
himself is revealed. There are, I confess,
multitudes in the world who,
although they cannot avoid some general
convictions of sin, as also of
the consequent of it, yet do fortify
their minds against a practical
admission of such conclusions as, in
a just consideration of things, do
necessarily and unavoidably ensue thereon.
Such persons, wilfully
deluding themselves with vain hopes
and imaginations, do never once
seriously inquire by what way or means
they may obtain peace with God and
acceptance before him, which, in comparison
of the present enjoyment of
the pleasures of sin, they value not
at all. And it is in vain to
recommend the doctrine of justification
unto them who neither desire nor
endeavour to be justified. But where
any persons are really made sensible
of their apostasy from God, of the
evil of their natures and lives, with
the dreadful consequences that attend
thereon, in the wrath of God and
eternal punishment due unto sin, they
cannot well judge themselves more
concerned in any thing than in the
knowledge of that divine way whereby
they may be delivered from this condition.
And the minds of such persons
stand in no need of arguments to satisfy
them in the importance of this
doctrine; their own concernment in
it is sufficient to that purpose. And
I shall assure them that, in the handling
of it, from first to last, I
have had no other design but only to
inquire diligently into the divine
revelation of that way, and those means,
with the causes of them, whereby
the conscience of a distressed sinner
may attain assured peace with God
through our Lord Jesus Christ. I lay
more weight on the steady direction
of one soul in this inquiry, than on
disappointing the objections of
twenty wrangling or fiery disputers.
The question, therefore, unto this
purpose being stated, as the reader
will find in the beginning of our
discourse, although it were necessary
to spend some time in the
explication of the doctrine itself,
and terms wherein it is usually
taught, get the main weight of the
whole lies in the interpretation of
scripture testimonies, with the application
of them unto the experience
of them who do believe, and the state
of them who seek after salvation by
Jesus Christ. There are, therefore,
some few things that I would desire
the reader to take notice of, that
he may receive benefit by the ensuing
discourse; at least, if it be not his
own fault, be freed from prejudices
against it, or a vain opposition unto
it.
1. Although there are at
present various contests about the doctrine
of justification, and may books published
in the way of controversy about
it, yet this discourse was written
with no design to contend with or
contradict any, of what sort or opinion
soever. Some few passages which
seem of that tendency are, indeed,
occasionally inserted; but they are
such as every candid reader will judge
to have been necessary. I have
ascribed no opinion unto any particular
person,--much less wrested the
words of any, reflected on their persons,
censured their abilities, taken
advantage of presumed prejudices against
them, represented their opinions
in the deformed reflections of strained
consequences, fancied intended
notions, which their words do not express,
nor, candidly interpreted,
give any countenance unto,--or endeavoured
the vain pleasure of seeming
success in opposition unto them; which,
with the like effects of weakness
of mind and disorder of affections,
are the animating principles of many
late controversial writings. To declare
and vindicate the truth, unto the
instruction and edification of such
as love it in sincerity, to extricate
their minds from those difficulties
(in this particular instance) which
some endeavour to cast on all gospel
mysteries, to direct the consciences
of them that inquire after abiding
peace with God, and to establish the
minds of them that do believe, are
the things I have aimed at; and an
endeavour unto this end, considering
all circumstances, that station
which God has been pleased graciously
to give me in the church, has made
necessary unto me.
2. I have written nothing
but what I believe to be true, and useful
unto the promotion of gospel obedience.
The reader may not here expect an
extraction of other men's notions,
or a collection and improvement of
their arguments, either by artificial
seasonings or ornament of style and
language; but a naked inquiry into
the nature of the things treated on,
as revealed in the Scripture, and as
evidencing themselves in their power
and efficacy on the minds of them that
do believe. It is the practical
direction of the consciences of men,
in their application unto God by
Jesus Christ for deliverance from the
curse due unto the apostate state,
and peace with him, with the influence
of the way thereof unto universal
gospel obedience, that is alone to
be designed in the handling of this
doctrine. And, therefore, unto him
that would treat of it in a due
manner, it is required that he weigh
every thing he asserts in his own
mind and experience, and not dare to
propose that unto others which he
does not abide by himself, in the most
intimate recesses of his mind,
under his nearest approaches unto God,
in his surprisals with dangers, in
deep afflictions, in his preparations
for death, and most humble
contemplations of the infinite distance
between God and him. Other
notions and disputations about the
doctrine of justification, not
seasoned with these ingredients, however
condited unto the palate of some
by skill and language, are insipid
and useless, immediately degenerating
into an unprofitable strife of words.
3. I know that the doctrine
here pleaded for is charged by many with
an unfriendly aspect towards the necessity
of personal holiness, good
works, and all gospel obedience in
general, yea, utterly to take it away.
So it was at the first clear revelation
of it by the apostle Paul, as he
frequently declares. But it is sufficiently
evinced by him to be the
chief principle of, and motive unto,
all that obedience which is accepted
with God through Jesus Christ, as we
shall manifest afterwards. However,
it is acknowledged that the objective
grace of the gospel, in the
doctrine of it, is liable to abuse,
where there is nothing of the
subjective grace of it in the hearts
of men; and the ways of its
influence into the life of God are
uncouth unto the seasonings of carnal
minds. So was it charged by the Papists,
at the first Reformation, and
continues yet so to be. Yet, as it
gave the first occasion unto the
Reformation itself, so was it that
whereby the souls of men, being set at
liberty from their bondage unto innumerable
superstitious fears and
observances, utterly inconsistent with
true gospel obedience, and
directed into the ways of peace with
God through Jesus Christ, were made
fruitful in real holiness, and to abound
in all those blessed effects of
the life of God which were never found
among their adversaries. The same
charge as afterwards renewed by the
Socinians, and continues still to be
managed by them. But I suppose wise
and impartial men will not lay much
weight on their accusations, until
they have manifested the efficacy of
their contrary persuasion by better
effects and fruits than yet they have
done. What sort of men they were who
first coined that system of religion
which they adhere unto, one who knew
them well enough, find sufficiently
inclined unto their Antitrinitarian
opinions, declares in one of the
queries that he proposed unto Socinus
himself and his followers. "If
this," says he, "be the truth which
you contend for, whence comes it to
pass that is is declared only by persons
'nulla pietatis commendatione,
nulla laudato prioris vitae exemplo
commendatos; imo ut prerumque
videmus, per vagabundos, et contentionum
zeli carnalis plenos homines,
alios ex castris, aulis, graneis, prolatam
esse. Scrupuli ab excellenti
viro propositi, inter oper. Socin.'"
The fiercest charges of such men
against any doctrines they oppose as
inconsistent with the necessary
motives unto godliness, are a recommendation
of it unto the minds of
considerative men. And there cannot
be a more effectual engine plied for
the ruin of religion, than for men
to declaim against the doctrine of
justification by faith alone, and other
truths concerning the grace of
our Lord Jesus Christ, as those which
overthrow the necessity of moral
duties, good works, and gospel obedience;
whilst, under the conduct of
the opinions which they embrace in
opposition unto them, they give not
the least evidence of the power of
the truth or grace of the gospel upon
their own hearts, or in their lives.
Whereas, therefore, the whole gospel
is the truth which is after godliness,
declaring and exhibiting that
grace of God which teaches us "to deny
all ungodliness and worldly lusts,
and that we should live soberly, and
righteously, and godly in this
world;" we being fallen into those
times wherein, under great and fierce
contests about notions, opinions, and
practices in religion, there is a
horrible decay in true gospel purity
and holiness of life amongst the
generality of men, I shall readily
grant that, keeping a due regard unto
the only standard of truth, a secondary
trial of doctrines proposed and
contended for may and ought to be made,
by the ways, lives, walkings, and
conversations of them by whom they
are received and professed. And
although it is acknowledged that the
doctrine pleaded in the ensuing
discourse be liable to be abused, yea,
turned into licentiousness, by men
of corrupt minds, through the prevalence
of vicious habits in them (as is
the whole doctrine of the grace of
God by Jesus Christ); and although the
way and means of its efficacy and influence
into universal obedience unto
God, in righteousness and true holiness,
be not discernible without some
beam of spiritual light, nor will give
an experience of their power unto
the minds of men utterly destitute
of a principle of spiritual life; yet,
if it cannot preserve its station in
the church by this rule, of its
useful tendency unto the promotion
of godliness, and its necessity
thereunto, in all them by whom it is
really believed and received in its
proper light and power, and that in
the experience of former and present
times, I shall be content that it be
exploded.
4. Finding that not a few
have esteemed it compliant with their
interest to publish exceptions against
some few leaves which, in the
handling of a subject of another nature,
I occasionally wrote many years
ago on this subject, I am not without
apprehensions, that either the same
persons or others of a like temper
and principles, may attempt an
opposition unto what is here expressly
tendered thereon. On supposition
of such an attempt, I shall, in one
word, let the authors of it know
wherein alone I shall be concerned.
For, if they shall make it their
business to cavil at expressions, to
wrest my words, wire-draw inferences
and conclusions from them not expressly
owned by me,--to revile my
person, to catch at advantages in any
occasional passages, or other
unessential parts of the discourse,--labouring
for an appearance of
success and reputation to themselves
thereby, without a due attendance
unto Christian moderation, candour,
and ingenuity,--I shall take no more
notice of what they say or write than
I would do of the greatest
impertinencies that can be reported
in this world. The same I say
concerning oppositions of the like
nature unto another writings of mine,-
-a work which, as I hear, some are
at present engaged in. I have somewhat
else to do than to cast away any part
of the small remainder of my life
in that kind of controversial writings
which good men bewail, and wise
men deride. Whereas, therefore, the
principal design of this discourse is
to state the doctrine of justification
from the Scripture, and to confirm
it by the testimonies thereof, I shall
not esteem it spoken against,
unless our exposition of Scripture
testimonies, and the application of
them unto the present argument, be
disproved by just rules of
interpretation, and another sense of
them be evinced. All other things
which I conceive necessary to be spoken
unto, in order unto the right
understanding and due improvement of
the truth pleaded for, are comprised
and declared in the ensuing general
discourses to that purpose. These few
things I thought meet to mind the reader
of.
J.O.
From my study, May the 30th, 1677.