|
|
Genesis 1-3 & the Hebrew names for God
Lee F Greer III
Loma Linda, California
© 2005
Prepared for the CHC
Rose Room Sabbath school class
of Larry Christoffel
& for the members of JIF
(Last updated March 2006)
Abstract. Our purpose is to explore what the first three chapters of Genesis with their creation accounts and the story of the fall of humankind tell us in their Hebrew context about the nature of God. This is the first part of a series in a Biblical study of the nature of God and of Christ.
Introduction & method – listening to the text in its own context
Exegesis is identifying what a text is originally saying in context and involves the five following steps (elaborated in the Appendix I of the Introduction to the Nature of God series).
(1) Determination of the text(s). Which text is the closest to the original? We adhere to the Hebrew Masoretic text (MT; using a system of vowel pointing, accents, and notes by early medieval Jewish scholars to transmit the text exactly as possible, Sanders, 1993a, b) and may use the Qumran Hebrew texts, the Syriac texts, and the Greek LXX for comparative purposes. Most modern translations of the Hebrew Bible are based on the MT. We will also reference the wonderfully nuanced translation of Genesis with commentary by Hebrew scholar Robert Alter (1996).
(2) Ascertaining the literary / oral form. It has long been recognized that there are two creation accounts skillfully woven together in Genesis 1-3. One is the Elohist (E) account of ch. 1 (using 'Elohim for God) and the other the Yahwist (J) account of ch. 2 (using YHWH 'Elohim). However these are only two of a total of possibly eight creation accounts in the Hebrew Scriptures: Gen. 1; 2; Job 26; 38; Ps. 104; Prov. 8, cf. perhaps Job 28:12-28 (seven of the eight). The shortest and most widely-attested, and likely the first and oldest, was probably an oral tradition affirming that the invisible God of heaven is "the One who alone stretched out the heavens" (captured in various textual contexts in Job 9:8; Ps. 104:2; Isa. 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 51:12; cf. 48:13; cf. 40:12; Jer. 51:15; Zech. 12:1; and likely reflected also in Gen. 1:6-8, the forming of 'the expanse' or 'the firmament' of 'heaven').
The structure of the Elohist (E)
creation account (Genesis 1-2:4a).
It has long been recognized
by some scholars that literary / theological structure and not chronological
content
determine the order in
Genesis
1 (JG von Herder, >2 centuries ago; Waltke & Fredericks, 2001; Irons
& Kline, 2001; summarized in Christian, 2003)
| Prologue (1:1-3a)
– In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. [Or]
When God ['Elohim] began to create the heavens and the earth, the earth was welter and waste ['unformed and unfilled'] and darkness over the face of the deep and the breath of God hovering over the waters; then God said, '....' [adapted from Alter, 1996] |
| Forming and separating | Filling and adorning |
| Prologue (1:1-3a) – Formless (chaos) | Prologue (1:1-3a) – Empty (chaos) |
a first day –
|
a fourth day –
|
a second day –
|
the fifth day –
|
the third day –
|
the sixth day –
|
the seventh day –
|
the seventh day –
|
| Epilogue (2:4a) – "This is the genealogy of the heavens and the earth in the day that they were created." |
The J creation account in Genesis 2 begins with a prologue which is adjacent to the epilogue of the E creation account in Genesis 1.
| Prologue (2:4b-6) – "On the day that the LORD God [YHWH 'Elohim] made earth and heaven, when there was yet no bush of the field and yet no plant of the field yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not caused it to rain on the earth [ha'eretz], and there was no human ['adam] to cultivate (serve) the humus [ha'adamah]. But a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground.... |
| 7and the LORD God formed the Human [ha'adam] of dust from the humus [ha'adamah], and breathed into his nostrils the breath [neshamah] of life [chayim]; and man became a living being [nephesh chayah]. | i) Formation of the Human [ha'adam] from humus [ha'adamah] |
v8-14 – YHWH 'Elohim
formed
|
ii) Planting of a Garden
for the Human in the eastern part of Eden (Edinn, i.e., the fertile
crescent of Mesopotamia)
iii) Moral choice for the Human: Tree of life in the middle of the Garden and the tree of Knowledge |
v15-20 – YHWH 'Elohim
The Human named them but found no sustainer for himself |
iv) Formation of other living beings from humus to be a sustainer for the Human which the Human names But no sustainer was found for the Human |
v21-25 – YHWH 'Elohim
|
v) Formation from the
Human: Man (Ish) & Woman (Ishah)
|
Distinguishing features between the Genesis 1 and 2 creation accounts
|
|
|
|
|
The fall of humankind (Genesis 3-4): Continuation of the J creation account
| Transitional prologue (3:1) – "Now the serpent was more crafty ['arum, a pun on 'naked,' 'arumim in 2:25; Alter, 1996] than any beast of the field which YHWH 'Elohim had made...." |
|
(ch. 3)
|
The rise of conflict in the earth (ch. 4)
|
(3) Recovering the contemporary historical life situation (setting). The setting, historical allusions, many place names, archeology, and historical linguistics of Genesis through Deuteronomy (and the 'former prophets,' Joshua through II Kings, as well as some of the 'latter prophets,' Isaiah, Hosea, Amos, and Micah) suggest an audience culturally associated with the 8th through early 6th centuries BCE in the pre-exilic kingdom of Judah and Jerusalem. These books probably came to be in their present essential form or edition during this interval, along with some of the early Psalms, and so were the main written heritage (within the broad oral culture and heritage) of the Hebrews living under the Judean kings of the house of David (dating scholarship discussed and summarized in Finkelstein & Silberman, 2001; Schniedewind, 2004).
(4) Meaning of the words and idiom for original author and audience. The words for God in Genesis 1-3 are 'Elohim and YHWH 'Elohim, which serve as dividers between the E and J creation accounts.
The words for 'spirit' and 'word' are also significant for Genesis 1-3. In Genesis 1, the primordial 'word' of God is simply what God said ('amar, v., a primitive root; to say [used with great latitude]; appears 4338 times in OT) during creation. Although dabar (davar) or 'word' in Hebrew does not appear in Genesis 1, God's 'word' in Gen. 1 appears in His commands and blessings.
Elsewhere in the Hebrew Scriptures, dabar appears 1,290 times in its noun form, and its verb form appears 1,050 times.
Genesis 1:26 and 3:22 have God speaking saying, "Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness...." or "the human is become like one of us...." respectively. The plural readings do not take away from the unity of God for at least a couple reasons. First, setting Gen. 1:26 aside for the moment, the other times such a plural pronoun is used in the Hebrew Bible (Gen. 3:22, 26; 11:7; Isa. 6:8), God is apparently addressing Himself to His heavenly retinue or council (see Buzzard & Hunting, 1998), including cherubim, who were pictured along with other heavenly beings as being present when He created or performed other important functions (cf. Gen. 3:26; Job 15:8; 38:7; I Kings 22:19-23; Ps. 104:1-5; Jer. 23:18). Secondly, returning to the case of Gen. 1:26, v27 immediately suggests that someone other than God is being addressed here also, because when the creating of humans actually actually takes place, there is a straightforward return to the singular pronouns in reference to God, "And God created the human in His image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them" (Gen. 1:27). Thirdly, as scholars have pointed out, a 'plural of majesty' or a 'plural of emphasis' is sometimes employed in various languages in pronouns relating to royalty or deity (for one Biblical example, see Ezra 4:11, 18 in the case of Artaxerxes; Graesar et al. 2003).
(5) Understanding the total context and historical background. It has been recognized by scholars that the creation accounts in the Hebrew Bible are almost all modeled after and a monotheist polemic against already-extant creation myths (Kikawada & Quinn, 1985; Christian, 2003; Hasel, 1974), such as the Epic of Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, etc. This is particularly true of the primordial story cycle in Genesis 1-11. As mentioned, the current recensions or editions of Genesis through II Kings (some Psalms; and a number of the prophets) were probably codified essentially by the 8th-6th century BCE (Finkelstein & Silberman, 2001; Schniedewind, 2004). Minor developments in the text have continued to occur until past the mid-3rd century BCE-1st century CE as evidenced in the Qumran manuscripts ('Dead Sea scrolls'). The text has remained essentially the same since the Masoretic scribes of the early medieval centuries CE. The text of the Hebrew Bible has been carefully cherished and studied by the Jews for centuries, long before Christ, and down into our own times. Conserving and defending their Hebrew heritage is what has helped the Jewish people resist assimilation and extinction.
The oldest historical records (23rd-21st
centuries BCE) of the idea of one transcendant God beyond the universe
are found in cuneiform tablets from Ebla (Heeren, 2000) more than 15 centuries
before the final recensions of our Hebrew Bible. The evidences for a prehistoric,
indigenous belief in one Deity, invisible, who originated the world and
rules heaven and earth, have been found in indigenous cultures all over
the world. This primordial monotheism has gradually receded for the most
part in those cultures being augmented by belief in more immediate deities,
spirits, and numina (Schmidt, 1912; 1931; 1933; Armstrong, 1993;
summarized in Greer, 2005). The ancient historic and prehistoric strands
of belief in one God form part of the background for the Hebrew Bible and
Biblical monotheism.
Discussion – How do you read?
"Historical criticism
has the necessary function of bringing into focus the issues that only
faith can decide. . . . We must distinguish between clarity as to what
the promise is and certainty that God will fulfill it. The former may be
aided by the work of the historian; the latter can rest solely on faith"
(Howard Clark Kee speaking
in the debt of Wolfhart Pannenberg; cited in Kee, 1970).
A) Questions from history:
Alter R. 1996. Genesis: Translation and commentary. New York, NY / London, UK: W. W. Norton & Company.
Armstrong K. 1993. A history of God: The 4000-year quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf (1994).
Burge D. 2005. "Divine agency in the Scriptures." Focus on the Kingdom, 7(9): 1-5. http://www.restorationfellowship.org.
Buzzard AF, Hunting CF. 1998. The doctrine of the Trinity: Christianity's self-inflicted wound. International Scholars Publications: Lanham, MD; Oxford, UK.
Christian E. 2003. "Implications of the literary structure of Genesis 1." Faith and Science Conference, 13-20 August 2003. Glacier View Ranch, Colorado.
Finkelstein I, Silberman NA. 2001. The Bible unearthed: Archaeology's new vision of ancient Israel and the origin of its sacred texts. New York, NY: The Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Graesar MH, Lynn JA, Schoenheit JW. 2003. One God & one Lord: Reconsidering the cornerstone of the Christian faith. (3rd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Christian Educational Services; http://www.CESonline.org; http://www.BiblicalUnitarian.com.
Greer LF. 2005. "Jesus and the revolutionary Kingdom of God: From the ancient Near East to the Common Era, an emerging ethic." The Jesus Institute Forum: http://www.jesusinstituteforum.org/JKG-ethics.html.
Heeren F. 2000. Show me God: What the message from space is telling us about God. (rev. ed.). Wonders, Vol. 1. Wheeling, IL: Day Star Publications.
Irons L & Kline MG. 2001. The Genesis debate: Three views on the days of creation. DG Hagopian, ed. Mission Viejo: Crux.
Kee HC. 1970. Jesus in history: An approach to the study of the gospels. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Sanders, 1993a. "Masorah." In: BM Metzger and MD Coogan (eds.), The Oxford companion to the Bible. New York, NY / Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
____. 1993b. "Masoretic text." In: BM Metzger and MD Coogan (eds.), The Oxford companion to the Bible. New York, NY / Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt W. 1912. Der Ursprung der Gottesidee. [The origin of the idea of God].
____. 1931. The origin and growth of religion. New York, NY: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc. [1971].
____. 1933. High Gods in North America. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Schniedewind WM. 2004. How the Bible became a book: The textualization of ancient Israel. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Waltke BK with Fredericks CJ. 2001. Genesis: A commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Return to Jesus Institute Forum home page.