The Jesus Institute Forum

Jesus and the revolutionary Kingdom of God

From the ancient Near East to the Common Era, an emerging ethic
 

Lee F Greer III
Loma Linda, California
© 2005

(Last updated November 2005)



Three quotes:

NAU 2 John 1:9 Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son.

NAU Acts 20:24 "But I do not consider my life of any account as dear to myself, so that I may finish my course and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify solemnly of the gospel of the grace of God.
NAU Acts 20:25 "And now, behold, I know that all of you, among whom I went about preaching the kingdom, will no longer see my face.


   This good news of the kingdom will be announced in the whole world as a witness to every nation, and then the end will come.

– Jesus of Nazareth, ~31 CE 
(Matt. 24:14)


   As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals and his religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes....

 – Benjamin Franklin
Letter to Ezra Stiles (1790)


   The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ leveled to every understanding, and too plain to need explanation, saw in the mysticism of Plato materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them; and for this obvious reason, that nonsense can never be explained.

 – Thomas Jefferson
Letter to John Adams (05 July 1814)
Quoted in Mayo (1942)


Abstract. Jesus' eschatological Kingdom of God announcement in the NT is deeply rooted in the prophetic tradition of the Hebrew Scripture, specifically on two foundations: (1) Covenantal justice-righteousness as retributive requiring atonement in God's sight, resulting in reconciliation or punishment. (2) Covenantal justice-righteousness as distributive of God's bounties to all. Covenant righteousness is Covenant justice. The Kingdom of God is the coming reign of God extended throughout all the earth, through His representative the Messiah.

Our purpose is to briefly review what was the universal "Kingdom of God" ethic that Jesus of Nazareth announced, and what were it's roots in the Hebrew prophetic tradition and in the ancient Near East. Also, what has happened to it in the Common Era? Specifically:

A few common factors seem key to answering these troubling questions, key to recovering what's been lost. A better time for recovery could not be found than now. For Christianity a true recovery must include not only the ethical but the theological.
Not only must the ethos of Jesus be recovered, but also a Biblical epistemology, theology, anthropology, soteriology, eschatology, christology, ecclesiology, and missiology. This paper is a broad review containing introductory thoughts on several topics calling for a fuller exploration later. (Feedback and suggestions are welcome).


CONTENTS


I. Roman Galilee and Since

Jesus of Nazareth (~3 BCE - ~30 CE) was a Jewish peasant from Roman Galilee who lived and died in the first century of the Common Era (CE; Crossan 1991). He began a "Kingdom of God" movement in Galilee, which spread to the Judean and Samarian prefecture, and ultimately evolved into what came to be called Christianity. Like the precursor reform movement of a likely Essene prophet, John the Baptist in the Judean wilderness, he also announced "the kingdom of heaven."

The main historical periods affecting Jesus' world and its aftermath as evidenced by archeology and exegesis (based in part on Crossan & Reed, 2001):

  1. Late Hellenistic period (2nd - mid-1st centuries BCE) – Jewish settlement of Galilee under the Hasmonean rulers (from the Maccabees) in a sparsely-populated agrarian world guarded by Hasmonean military outposts and surrounded by agrarian Gentiles and Hellenistic towns.
  2. Early Roman period (mid-1st century BCE - 1st century CE) – Under direct Roman rule (from 63 CE), Herod the Great's (designated 'king of the Jews') kingdom and trade-building (37-4 BCE) included the magnificent artificial harbor, Roman Caesarea Maritima, and the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Rome drew and quartered Herod's kingdom leaving a Galilee tetrarchate to Herod Antipas (4 BCE-39 CE), who urbanized Galilee and built Greco-Roman Sephoris and Tiberias. Trade boomed, but debt and taxes led to wealth for a few and increasing landlessness for many. Hellenistic culture encroached on Jewish identity. Judea became a Roman prefecture under Pontius Pilate (26 CE). Exegetical layers in approximate time frames:
  3. Middle and Late Roman periods (2nd - mid-4th centuries CE) – Swept by two Jewish-Roman wars (66-74, 132-35 CE), Galilee incorporated into a Roman province called Palestina. Accelerating trade, urbanization, and population growth in Galilee, including refugees from Jerusalem and Judea – Galilee now watched over by a permanently-stationed Roman legion. Synagogue replaces Temple as center of Jewish religion. Judaism and Christianity severed by mutual recrimination and persecution, the former retreating into a growing diaspora, and the latter advancing politically and being transformed by Greco-Roman neo-Platonism.
  4. Byzantine period (mid-4th - 7th centuries CE) – After Constantine the Great converted with the Roman Empire to Christianity, imperial investment and monument-building made Palestine into a place with pilgrim shrines, churches, and monasteries. A rather long period of cultural decline but coexistence between Jewish and Christian Galilee. Christianity wracked by divisions as a series of imperial Roman-sponsored political, structural, and conciliar developments where the Greco-Roman and the neo-Platonic often clearly triumphed over the Hebrew and the Scriptural. (Numerous historians and scholars of different persuasions have documented these alterations in Christian theology, anthropology, soteriology, eschatology, christology, and ecclesiology. Cosmology was likewise affected until the Copernican Revolution of the 16th century and onwards).
  5. Medieval period begins (7th-12th centuries CE and onward) – After the rapid Islamic conquests during a time of cultural resurgence and advance in the Near East, troubled western Christianity eventually but temporarily retakes the 'holy land' from the Muslims during the Crusades marked by blood baths which echo to our day. As Christianity became less universal and more Roman, Byzantine, etc., it underwent a series of schisms between the 6th and 16th centuries which mark the bloodiest intervals of human history until the 20th century. During this period successive waves of madness rocked christendom. Indeed those religious paroxysms of hatred have continued even through and past the 20th century (e.g., complicity in the following – the Holocaust, genocide in Nazi-allied Ustachi Croatia, attrocities in post-Cold War former Yugoslavia, the genocide in Rwanda, etc., and yes, a measure of bystander and collaborative guilt in great economic deprivations, such as colonialism, unjust global trade treaties, 'third world' and labor exploitation, etc.).
.
The Roman Empire at the time of Gaius Julius Caesar, 44 BCE

<Posting pending image permission>
Roman Empire at the time of Jesus:
  • Included Palestine west all the way past the Straits of Gibraltar
  • From the Black Sea northern shores and central Europe into N Africa

Herodian Greco-Roman Galilee: Caesarea Maritima and Tiberias

<Posting pending image permission>
Reconstruction of 1st century Caesarea Maritima on the Mediterranean Sea 
built by Herod the Great (37-4 BCE)
  • Breakwater and lighthouse of all-weather harbor
  • Wharf with giant store houses
  • Overland freshwater aqueduct from north (foreground)
  • Roman orthogonal throughfares: N-S axis cardo (N-S) and decumanus (E-W) 
  • Boulevards centered on huge temple dedicated to goddess Roma and Caesar Augustus
  • South end: An amphitheater-like hippodrome for games
  • Herod's palace jutting out into the Mediterranean Sea
<Posting pending image permission>
Reconstruction of 1st century Tiberius on the Sea of Galilee
built by Herod Antipas (4 BCE-39 CE), and named after Tiberius Caesar
  • Similar to Caesarea Maritima but without the pagan temples
  • Walls were finished after the time of Jesus
  • Palace was behind the amphitheater (alluded to in Luke 7:25)
  • Cardo (N-S) and decumanus (E-W)
  • Herod's new capital after moving it from Sepphoris
Herod's Greco-Roman Galilee: What was it like?
  • Hellenization
  • Romanization
  • urbanization
  • commercialization
  • The economic boom of the Pax Romana had arrived in the lower Galilee, a prosperity which was not 'trickling down': Ancient social safety nets were being dislocated
    • peasant extended family kinship
    • village cohesion
    • the rise of peasant debt
    • a more just land distribution was giving way to landlessness and indigence
    • unemployment (until morning, mid-morning, noon, late afternoon, evening)
(Crossan & Reed, 2001)

Commercialization had largely replaced Covenant, just as when Jeroboam II in the northern Kingdom of Israel (8th century BCE) was opposed by the oracles of Amos. Archeology has found the imported Egyptian and Phoenician artistry, Hebrew inscriptions of royal taxes on oil and wine, hundreds of ivory fragments and plagues from royal palaces. Amos called for justice because "justice equals righteousness; to do what is just equals to do what is right" (Crossan & Reed, 2001):

In Beth-'El the "sanctuary of the king and the temple of the kingdom," confrontation after Amaziah the priest accused Amos to Jeroboam II as "raising a conspiracy against you in the very heart of Israel" As distilled by Crossan & Reed (2001), Amos 7:10-17:
Amaziah, priest of Beth-'El
Amos, prophet of Tekoa
Commerce
Covenant
  • Amaziah: "God demands worship and we obey."
  • Amos: "God demands justice and you do not obey."
  • Amaziah: "What you call injustice, we call commercial prosperity; what you call unrighteousness, we call business acumen."
  • Amos: "You cannot worship a God of justice in a state of injustice."
  • Amaziah: "Leave the temple, prophet, while you are still alive to do so."

A central and unavoidable theme of the prophets was that service to God and repentance included justice for the poor and downtrodden.
 

II. 'The Kingdom of God is closing in!'

John the Baptist

The earliest detailed proclamation of the coming kingdom of God attributed to John the Baptist (a possible Essene) is found in an early unique tradition common to Luke and Matthew (perhaps as early as the 50s CE or before, Kee, 1970; Funk et al. 1993). This discernable tradition (i.e., source, German Quelle abbreviated Q; see Appendix I) seems to be a collection of aphorisms and parables in topical order upon which both Matthew and Luke were indebted and preserved to a greater or lesser extent (Eichhorn, 1810-1820). This tradition is distinct from what they share in common with Mark which for a number of reasons is likely to be the earliest of the canonical gospels (Styler, 1993; Funk et al., 1993; cf. Thiede, 2000; Thiede & D'Ancona, 1996).

In John's proclamation of the encroaching 'Kingdom of God' he added water baptism in Jordan. As we shall see, John's stark message-enactment was even more revolutionary than often thought.

John heralding the Kingdom of God
(Source: Q)

Luke 3
(Allusions to the Hebrew Scriptures)
Matthew 3
(Allusions to the Hebrew Scriptures)
1¶Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene,
2while Annas and Caiaphas were high priests, the word of God came to John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.
3And he went into all the region around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins, 
(An early reference to baptism)
.
.
4as it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying: 
"The voice of one crying in the wilderness: 
'Prepare the way of the Lord; 
Make His paths straight.
5Every valley shall be filled 
and every mountain and hill brought low; 
The crooked places shall be made straight 
and the rough ways smooth;
6And all flesh shall see the salvation of God.'"
1¶In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea,
 
 
 
 
 
 

2and saying, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is closing in!"

Dan 2:44; cf. Mt 4:17; 10:7 (cf. SV, Funk et al. 1993)
3For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying: 
"The voice of one crying in the wilderness: 
'Prepare the way of the Lord; 
Make His paths straight.'"
.
.
.
.
.
.
4And John himself was clothed in camel's hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey.
5Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him
6and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins.
7Then he said to the multitudes that came out to be baptized by him, 
"Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
8Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, 
and do not begin to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I tell you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones.
9And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire."
10So the people asked him, saying, "What shall we do then?"
11He answered and said to them, "He who has two tunics, let him give to him who has none; and he who has food, let him do likewise."
12Then tax collectors also came to be baptized, and said to him, "Teacher, what shall we do?"
13And he said to them, "Collect no more than what is appointed for you."
14Likewise the soldiers asked him, saying, "And what shall we do?" So he said to them, "Do not violently intimidate anyone or accuse falsely, and be content with your wages."
7¶ But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, 
"Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
8Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance,
9and do not think to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as (our) father.' For I tell you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones.
10And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
(NKJV – Power BibleCD 3.7)

John was an Elijah-like figure "clothed in camel's hair, with a leather belt around his waist" and subsisting on "locusts and wild honey" like Elijah returning from Horeb! He heralded the kingdom citing messianic (Jubilee) portions of Isaiah, and calling for kingdom justice now, an overt change of course from injustice to justice, just as in Isaiah 1. Kingdom living begins now in repentance and justice. In his Jordan baptism, John was taking "Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan [who] went out to him" through "the Jordan confessing their sins" into the Promised Land! "It is an action which starts what it symbolizes" (Crossan & Reed, 2001). In requesting personal baptism from a reluctant John, Jesus said, "Permit it [to be so] now, for in this way it is appropriate for us to fulfill all righteousness" (Matt. 3:15).

John's proclamation-enactment (with further details from Luke's version):

Messianic expectation reached a crescendo with speculation about whether this wilderness prophet was the Messiah, according to Luke (3:15) and John (1:15-26). And John was quick to point to someone else yet to come as Messiah with a mission of baptism with the Holy Spirit and fire, and of judgment using the Near Eastern metaphor of "winnowing the threshingfloor."

John heralding a Messiah bringing his own baptism and judgment
(Source: Q)

Luke 3
Matthew 3
16John answered, saying to all, "I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
 Mr 1:8; Lu 3:16; Joh 1:15, 26, 33; Acts 1:5; 2:3-4; 11:16; 19:4; 1 Cor 12:13
17His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather the wheat into His barn; but the chaff He will burn with unquenchable fire."
Isa 4:4, cf. 44:3; Mal 3:2-3; 4:1; cf. Mt 13:30
18And with many other exhortations he evangelized [i.e., preached the gospel to; euaggelizo] the people.
11"I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
Mr 1:8; Lu 3:16; Joh 1:15, 26, 33; Acts 1:5; 2:3-4; 11:16; 19:4; 1 Cor 12:13
12His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire."
Isa 4:4; cf. 44:3; Mal 3:2-3; 4:1; cf. Mt 13:30
(Modified from NKJV – Power BibleCD 3.7)

John's announcement-action and baptism proved too much for Herod Antipas tetrarch of Galilee who finally imprisoned John for rebuking him over taking his brother Philip's wife (Mark 6:17; Matt. 14:3), and because of "all the evils which Herod had done" (Luke 3:19). Herod ultimately beheaded John (Mark 6:21-29; Matt. 14:6-12). It was after John's imprisonment that Jesus came announcing God's Kingdom in the Galilee.

The baptism and temptations of Messiah. In the gospels, the section about John the Baptist is concluded and the sections focused on Jesus of Nazareth are commenced with the stories about the baptism of Jesus by John in Jordan and the temptations of Jesus by the adversary in the wilderness. All the gospels testify that Jesus of Nazareth was baptized by John the Baptist with miraculous signs. Only Q (cited by Matthew and Luke) tells how Jesus was tempted on food, fate, and kingdom, and conquered on each.

Nazareth
(21st and 1st centuries CE)


<Posting pending image permission>

<Posting pending image permission>
Reconstruction of Nazareth in the 1st century CE
(Other than the gospels, there was no historical reference to Nazareth until the Roman Empire converted to Christianity and pilgrims began to arrrive in the 4th century CE)
  • South-facing Jewish village of peasants (nearly anonymous until the 4th century CE) 
  • Watered by a spring (now called the "Well of Mary")
  • Lower fields (background) of grains, vegetables, and legumes
  • Vineyards, olive trees, and towerlike columbaria for raising pigeons on upper slopes
  • Winepress, collection vat, bottles, and pruning hooks (foreground)
  • Houses of unhewn stones and mud with underground cavities, including living space, bell-shaped cisterns, and plastered cisterns for grain-storage
  • Only a few copper coins and cheap jewelry found in burial sites
  • Simple cooking vessels and jars
  • Two stepped and plastered ritual baths (miqwaoth) for ceremonial washing
  • Kokhim or loculi, burial shafts where the dead were placed until there were only bones left to be collected in ossuaries (standard Jewish burial custom of the 1st century)
  • No synagogue remains from the 1st century CE have been found – this may reflect a time when synagogue also simply meant "a gathering" which occurred in a village house or open area (Luke 4)
(Crossan & Reed, 2001)

7Q5: Fragment of Mark 6:52-53 from Qumran; dated ~50s CE by papyrological evidence (Thiede and D'Ancona, 1996); found with a fragment of II Timothy.

Jesus of Nazareth: Jubilee kingdom – Early announcement in the Galilee

The earliest proclamation of 'the Kingdom of God' attributed to Jesus is found in Mark (perhaps written as early as 50 CE; Thiede and D'Ancona, 1996; Thiede, 2000). Again the setting is the apocalyptic proclamation of John the Baptist calling for the baptism of repentance for forgiveness because of the Kingdom coming and 'a mightier one' (Messiah). Similar to the Luke-Matthew common (Q) tradition, John the Baptist's eschatological proclamation in Mark (1:2-3) referenced Isaiah but alluded also to Mal. 3:1, Isa. 40:3, and Exod. 23:20 in the LXX, and reminded his contemporaries of the prophecy of Elijah coming (Mal. 4:5; cf. Mark 9:11-13; Matt. 17:10-12; Luke 1:17)

2As it has been written in Isaiah the prophet,
'Look, I send My messenger before Your face,
Who will prepare Your way
3A voice of (one) crying in the desert:
Prepare the way of the Lord,
make straight His paths...'
(cit. Isa. 40:3)

Mark describes the result of the Baptist's proclamation was that all the country of Judea and all of Jerusalem were going out to him, being baptized and confessing their sins, and that Jesus of Nazareth also came to be baptized (Mark 1). As mentioned, John was quickly perceived as a threat and Herod imprisoned him. In this context Jesus of Nazareth entered into the Galilee to proclaim the 'kingdom.'


Jesus' first announcement in the Galilee according to Mark's gospel
Mark 1:14-15
(Allusions to the Hebrew Scriptures)
References and comments
14And after John was delivered [into custody], Jesus came into the Galilee proclaiming the good news of God [to euaggelion tou Theou], 

15and saying, 'The time has been fulfilled [oti peplyrow/tai o' kairos] and the kingdom of God is closing in ['yggiken 'y Basileia tou Theou];* repent and believe in the good news.'
 
 

*Scholars' Version (SV, Funk et al., 1993): 'the kingdom of God is closing in.'

v14 – Imprisonment of John. 'Gospel' or 'good news / tidings' appears 98 times as a noun (euaggelion) and 52 times as a verb (euaggelizo) in the NT. The origins of the NT usage of this Greek root in an eschatological sense emerge from the LXX of Isa. 40:9 (cited in Mark 1), 41:27, 52:7, 61:1 (a reference to the Jubilee Day of Atonement of Lev. 16, 25, and explicitly cited by Jesus in the Galilee in Luke 4 and elsewhere), and Nah. 1:14. 

v15 – 'The time has been fulfilled...' is a direct reference to the '70 (sabbatical) weeks' of Dan. 9:23-27; 'the kingdom of God' is an allusion to Dan. 2:44-45 'And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed...' and is paralleled in Matt. 4:12-17 "...Repent because the kingdom of the heavens is closing in." Repent and believe are paralleled a number of times in the gospels.

Aside from the notion that God is already ruler over all and apportions kingdoms and nations, the idea that YHWH 'the God of heaven' would set up an eschatological 'kingdom' which would climactically break into history appears a few times in the Hebrew Scriptures, Ps. 2:9; 22:28; 45:6; Isa. 9:6-7; 60:12; Micah 4:7; Obad. 1:21; Zech. 14:9 (cf. 9;9-10; Ps. 47:7), and elsewhere.

Jesus cites Daniel. However the intervening and supplanting 'Kingdom' of the 'God' of 'heaven' is mentioned most explicitly and strikingly in Dan. 2:44-45, "In the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set a kingdom which shall not be destroyed forever. And the kingdom shall not be left to other peoples. It will crush and make an end to all these kingdoms and it shall stand forever..." (cf. LXX, almost identical). Not only was this kingdom to be 'like a stone cut out without hands' which would strike the vast 'image' of earth's kingdoms on the feet, it was to become 'a great mountain filling the whole earth' (2:31-35, 45). Jesus' Galilee proclamation of 'the Kingdom of God' involved a citation of Daniel 2 including some of the very words of the LXX.

It would seem that this kingdom at least inaugurally was to first appear while the kingdoms of earth were still standing (Isa. 2; Micah 4; Dan. 2; 7:9-12; Zech. 14; cf. Heb. 12:22-24; Rev. 4-5; Beale, 1999) and be inaugurated by the "near" approach with "the clouds of heaven" of "one like a Son of man to the Ancient of Days" in "the judgment" to "receive a kingdom" over all forever (Dan. 7:9-14, 18, 22, 27). And then consummatively, to consume and replace all kingdoms of this present age. The repeated use of 'Son of man' as a messianic epithet (attributed 81 times in the gospels, and 85 times in the NT) seems to be a direct allusion to the messianic 'Son of man' figure in Daniel 7.

Jesus' central kingdom proclamation "The time is fulfilled..." came from the next prophetic cycle in Daniel 8-9 which climaxes in the dramatic oracle of Daniel 8:14, "Unto 2,300 evening-mornings, then shall the sanctuary be vindicated" which 'vindication' is explicitly explained in 9:24-27 in sabbatical Jubilee Day of Atonement terms. That this was understood by some at least in similar terms in Jesus' day is evident in the Qumran Melchizedeq fragment, 11Q13.

Jesus cites Isaiah. From the wilderness after his baptism, Jesus returned announcing and healing into Galilee amid unprecedented good reports ('being glorified by all" Luke 4:14-15). Apparently he not only cited Daniel's sabbatical, Jubilee 'Kingdom of God' (as reported in Mark 1:14-15) but also the Jubilee as cited in Isaiah 61. He returned to his hometown Nazareth.

Luke 4
(Allusions to the Hebrew Scriptures)
References / comments
16And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up; and according to his custom went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up to read;
17and there was given to him a role of the prophet Isaiah. He opened the scroll and found the place where it was written,
18'(The) Spirit of (the) Lord is upon me, because He has anointed me to announce good news [euaggelizo] to the poor [ptochos, lit. the destitute]. He has sent me to declare aloud [keryzo, to herald] to the captives [aichmalotos, lit. a prisoner of war, of the spear] freedom [aphesis] and to (the) blind (ones) sight, to send away [aposteilai] the crushed (ones) in freedom,
19to herald a year of the Lord('s) acceptance [dekton].'
20And having closed the roll, returning (it) to the attendant [hyperety] he sat; and all of the eyes in the synagogue were gazing at him.
21And he began to say to them, 'Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your ears.' 
v16 – Proclamation in Nazareth came on Sabbath as was customary for him, as also in Capernaum (cf. 4:31) He began a program of 'Sabbath acts'

v17 – Note that he decided what he would read and found it, not relying on a pre-existing reading schedule or lectionary

v18 – Cites loosely the LXX of Isa. 61:1-2, although missing the phrases, 'to heal the broken in heart' and 'the day of recompence,' and added 'to send away [aposteilai] the crushed (ones) in freedom' which is absent from the LXX but is paralleled by the MT phrase 'and to those bound, a prison-opening.' 

v19 – The 50th year of Jubilee (Lev. 25:9) inaugurated by the 49th Day of Atonement was indeed 'the year of YHWH's acceptance.'

v20 – 'the attendant' (cf. John Mark in Acts 13:5)
 

v21 – Proclaimed the arrival and prophetic fulfillment of the real Jubilee Day of Atonement just on time (Dan. 9:23-27)

Isaiah 61 MT

1¶The Spirit of the Lord YHWH (is) on me; for YHWH has anointed [mashach] me to bear good tidings [basar] to the needy ['anavaim]. He has sent me to bind up the broken of heart, to declare aloud [qara'] to captives, freedom! and to those bound, a prison-opening! [peqach-qowach]! 

Lev 16; 25-26; Isa 11:2; 42:7; 57:15; Jer 34:8; Lu 4:18-19
2to declare aloud the year of acceptance of YHWH, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all mourners;
Lev 25:9; Isa 34:8; 57:18; 63:4; 66:14; Mal 4:1,3; Mt 5:4; 2Th 1:7-9
3to appoint to the mourners of Zion, to give them beauty instead of ashes, the oil of joy instead of mourning, the mantle of praise instead of the spirit of feebleness; (so) that (one) calls them, trees of righteousness, planting of YHWH, to beautify Himself.
Ps 1; 30:11; Isa 60:21; Joh 15:8, 18
4They shall build up the ruins of forever, of former times they shall raise up; they shall restore cities of waste, the ruins of generation and generation [i.e., many generations].
Lev 16; 25-26; Isa 49:8; 58:12; Ezek 36:33-36
5And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, foreigners (shall be) your plowmen and vinedressers.
cf. Eph 2:12
6But you shall be called 'priests of YHWH.' It will be spoken of you [as] ministers of our God. Riches of nations you shall eat, and in their glory you shall boast.
Exod 19:6; Isa 60:5,11,16-17; 66:21; 1 Pet 2:5, 9; Rev 1:6; 5:10
7Instead of your shame and disgrace, [you shall have] double, they rejoice in your alotted portion; therefore in their land they shall possess a second time; joy everlasting shall be theirs.
Lev 16; 25-26; Isa 40:2; Zec 9:12
8For I YHWH love justice [mishpat, just judgment], I hate robbery for burnt offering; I will give their work in truth, and I will cut an everlasting Covenant for them.
Ps 11:7; Isa 1:10-15; 55:3
9Their descendants shall be known among the nations, and their offspring in the midst of the peoples: all seeing them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed whom YHWH has blessed.
Isa65:23
10¶ I will greatly rejoice in YHWH, let my soul exult in my God; for He has clothed me (with) garments of salvation. The robe of righteousness He put on me, as a groom puts on (his) ornaments, and as a bride wears her jewels. 
Ps 132:9,16; Isa 49:18; Hab 3:18; Rev 21:2
11For as the earth brings out her sprouts, and as a garden causes to spring up what is sown, so the Lord YHWH will make grow righteousness and praise before all the nations.
Ps 72:3; 85:11; Isa 60:18; 62:7
Isaiah 61 LXX

1The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because He has anointed me; He has sent me to proclaim good news [euaggelisasthai] to the poor [ptochos], to heal the broken in heart, to declare aloud [keryzo] to the captives [aichmalotos] freedom [aphesis] and to (the) blind (ones) sight.
2to declare the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of recompense; to comfort all that mourn;
3that there should be give to them that mourn in Sion glory instead of ashes, the oil of joy to the mourners, the garment of glory for the spirit of heaviness: and they shall be called generations of righteousness, the planting of the Lord for glory.
4And they shall build the old waste places, they shall raise up those that were before made desolate, and shall renew the desert cities, (even) those that had been desolate for (many) generations.
5And strangers shall come and feed your flocks, and aliens (shall be your) ploughmen and vine-dressers.
6But you shall be called priests of the Lord, the ministers of God: You shall eat the strength of nations, and shall be admired because of their wealth.
7Thus shall they inherit the land a second time, and everlasting joy shall be upon their head. 
8For I am the Lord who loves righteousness, and hate robberies of injustice; and I will give their labor to the just, and will make an everlasting Covenant with them.
9And their seed shall be known among the nations, and their offspring in the midst of peoples: Everyone who sees them shall take notice of them, that they are a seed blessed of God.
10And they shall greatly rejoice in the Lord.
¶Let my soul rejoice in the Lord, for He has clothed me with the robe of salvation, and the garment of joy. He has put a mitre on me as on a bridegroom, and adorned me with ornaments as a bride.
11And as the earth putting forth her flowers, and as a garden its seed, so shall the Lord, (even) the Lord, cause righteousness to spring forth, and exultation before all the nations.
 

MT = Hebrew Masoretic text; LXX = Greek Septuagint (many quotes and references – Power BibleCD 3.7).
The Isaiah 61 Messianic (anointed), Jubilee program:
  • Lord YHWH sends an Anointed, i.e., Messiah, to herald... 
  • good news to the destitute, binding up of the heart-broken, liberty to the bound, comfort to the mourners
  • 'the year of YHWH's acceptence' (Jubilee) and 'the day of vengeance of our God' (Jubilee Day of Atonement)
  • to Zion's mourners: beauty, oil of joy, mantle of praise, (to be) trees of righteousness
  • restoration from generations of waste and ruin (Jubilee restoration)
  • served by strangers and strangers
  • a new 'priesthood of YHWH' as 'ministers of God' receiving the wealth and glory of the nations
  • a double alotted portion, possession again of their land, joy everlasting (Jubilee restoration)
  • establishment of their justice and righteousness, an everlasting Covenant
  • renown among all the nations as YHWH's blessed seed
  • Messiah clothed in salvation and righteousness and adorned by YHWH
  • Lord YHWH in the sight of all the nations grows up righteousness and praise

Kingdom storytelling. According to Luke 4, Jesus explicitly announced God's Jubilee Kingdom so as to include Gentiles and very nearly got him killed by his own townsfolk in Nazareth. It hardly seems coincidental that after the Nazareth incident, according to the synoptic gospels, Jesus seems to have adopted a different stratagem:

Some of these stories include the following. (In this paper we include some parallels from the gospel of Thomas, because scholars are agreed that some authentic sayings of Jesus are captured within this forgotten gospel. Parallels with the canonical, synoptic gospels are among the criteria for assessing authentic sayings in Thomas).
Parable / parabolic aphorism
Passage
Sources attested
Fishing for men Mk. 1:16-20; Mt. 4:18-22 (cf. Lk. 5:1-11; Jn. 21:1-8) Mark
I came for other villages too Mk. 1:35-39; Lk. 2:42-44 Mark
Who needs a doctor?  Mk. 2:17; Mt. 9:12, 13b; Lk. 5:31-32 Mark
Fasting & the bridegroom's friends Mk. 2:19-20; Lk. 5:34-35; Th. 104:3 Mark; Thomas
Patches on old garments & old wineskins Mk. 2:21-22; Mt. 9:16-17; Lk. 5:36-38; Th. 47:3 Mark; Thomas
Sabbath for man: Lord of the Sabbath Mk. 2:23-28; Mt. 12:1-8; Lk. 6:1-5 Mark
Satan divided Mk. 3:23-26; Mt. 12:25-26 =  Lk. 11:17-18 Mark; Q
Binding the strong man Mk. 3:27; Mt. 12:29; Lk. 11:21-22; Th. 35:1-2 Mark; Q; Thomas
Blasphemies forgiven Mk. 3:28-29; Lk. 12:10; Th. 44:1-3 Mark; Q; Thomas
Real mother, brother, and sister Mk. 3:31-35; Mt. 12:46-50; Lk. 8:19-21; Th. 99:1-3 Mark; Thomas
The sower  Mk. 4:3-8; Mt. 13:3-8; Lk. 8:5-8a; Th. 9:1-5 Mark; Thomas
(Two) good ears to hear! Mk. 4:9, 23; 7:16; Mt. 11:15; 13:9, 43; Lk. 8:8; 14:35 Recurring widely in the tradition
Lamp under a bushel Mk. 4:21; Mt. 5:15;  Mark; Q; Thomas
Nothing hidden not exposed Mk. 4:22 Mark; Q; Thomas
Judgment: The same standard applied applies   Mark; Q
     
(Catalogue adapted from the SV, Funk et al. 1993)

And so on! According to the synoptics, many of his most public teachings were parabolic.

"Hear, O Israel: YHWH (is) our God, YHWH is One!"The synoptic gospels (Mark 12:28-34; cf. Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:25-28) attest that Jesus of Nazareth linked the great shema Israel creed, "Hear, O Israel: YHWH (is) our God, YHWH is One! You shall love YHWH your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength" (Deut. 6:4-5) together with the latter part of "'You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am YHWH'" (Lev. 19:18). Mark describes Jesus as declaring, "The first [commandment] is.... [The] second (is) this.... Greater than these is no other commandment." Matthew has him affirm, "This is the first and great commandment, and second is like it" and add that "on these two hang all the law and the prophets." Jesus radicalized the Levitcal command to "love your neighbor" by extending it beyond just "the children of your people" to include all, even enemies, as inclusive and free as the sunshine and rain of YHWH Himself. Luke has Jesus conclude and answer the question, "And who is my neighbor?" with the story of a Samaritan who crossed ethnic-religious barriers to rescue a Jew who had been robbed and wounded. Jesus said, "Go and do likewise" (Luke 10:29-37). The emphasis Jesus put on 'love for neighbor' may well have led to its recurrent citation in the NT epistles (Rom. 13:9-10; Gal. 5:14; James 2:8).

Jesus' citation of the great shema Israel

Mark 12
References
28And one of the scribes [grammatew/n] approaching . . . questioned him, "What commandment is foremost of all?"
29Jesus answered, "The first is: 'Hear, Israel! The Lord our God is one Lord
30'And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.' 
31[The] second (is) this: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' Greater than these there is no other commandment." 
v28 – In the style of rabbinic dispute a scribe asks what's the most important commandment.

v29-30 – Jesus responds with the great shema Israel (Deut. 6:4-5) and couples it with 'love for neighbor' (Lev. 19:18)

Jesus of Nazareth so radicalized the shema Israel and love for neighbor by combining them that the revolutionary and subversive 'Kingdom of God' ultimately alarmed the Temple establishment (mostly Sadducees), the synagogue establishment (mostly Pharisees), the Herodian partisans, and even the imperial representatives of the Roman empire of Caesar in Judea.

Jesus the subversive enactor

Luke 12
Thomas

49I came to cast fire upon the earth, and what if I've seen to it [that] it['s] already alight!
10Jesus said, 
"I have cast fire upon the world, and look, I'm guarding it till it blazes!" (SV)

Radicalizing 'agapé' into justice in action. Christians have traditionally translated agapé as "love" and the verb agapao as "to love" and equated it with charity, or eventually an abstract, neo-Platonic conception like "to love out of principle" (whatever that means!) However, agapao should be translated much more concretely "to share" (Crossan & Reed, 2001), and it probably derives at least in part from agan which means "much" or "abundant" (Strong's). Hence, agapao and agapé most likely meant "to share abundantly" or "sharing abundantly." In both Torah and the Prophets, justice (v. tsedaqah, n. tsedeq) is not only retributive, but distributive (Ibid.), and is equivalent in the NT, to being and to declaring just-righteous (v. dikaio) and justice-righteousness (n. dikaiosyne), not only what God freely counts to believing sinners (Rom. 3-4) but reflected in how we are to live. On Jesus' lips, agapé is abundant God-style sharing, i.e., how God's justice and kingdom begins on earth now! In John's first epistle, "By this we know agapé [God-style sharing], because he laid down his life for us. And we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren." Then comes the application of agapé: "But whoever has this world's goods, and sees his brother in need, and shuts up his heart from him, how does the agapé [God-style sharing] of God abide in him? My little children, let us not agapé [engage in God-style sharing] in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth" (I John 3:16-18).

Two slave masters
Source: Q

Matthew 6
Luke 12
Setting: Following the separate Q-attested sayings about 'treasure in the heavens' and 'eye as lamp of the body' and preceding the double-attested 'freedom from anxiety' cluster (Q and Thomas) Setting: Following the singly-attested parable of the 'unjust stewart' and the aphorisms about being 'faithful' vs 'unjust' and preceding the Q-attested 'kingdom of God entering with violence' sayings cluster to the 'money-loving Pharisees'
24No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon. 13No slave* can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.
*Slave masters require entire loyalty of slaves, unlike what's required of a servant or a day laborer – Jesus suggests
that such all-encompassing devotion to either God or materialism comprises the only two options.

God vs mammon: What it meant for the prophets and for Jesus

Mammon: Commerce-Ownership
God: 
Covenant-Stewardship
"Generously sharing what is ours" "Equitably distributing what is God's!"
Condescending
  • Generosity responding to a mere charitable need – denies any right
  • Granting our gift to our fellow human beings
Equal serving
  • Duty responding to a God-endowed human right
  • Only paying our debt to our fellow human beings
For a devastating refutation by 'legal realism' of the self-contradictiory nature of 'laissez-faire' economics, see Sunstein, 2004; Fried, 2001. 

To further illustrate the difference between commerce and Covenant, and the practical implications of recognition of basic human needs as human rights, we add the following excursus:

Excursus in realism: Natural rights vs the myth of 'laissez-faire'

Since the Enlightenment (17th-18th centuries), many human rights (the natural rights of humankind) have come to be recognized as fundamental, self-evident, and inalienable by most peoples in the world, in constitutions, treaties, and international human rights law (e.g., UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights). The US Declaration of Independence (1776) summarized three broad catagories, into which we may subdivide specific human rights:
  • I. "life" – the right to live, including food, clothing, shelter, health care, freedom from desperate living conditions 
  • II. "liberty" – freedom of worship, thought, and expression, civil and political liberties 
  • III. "the pursuit of happiness" – freedom to pursue dreams and personal growth, right to education, to work, to personal development and enterprise, to a culture heritage, to the advances of science and technology, etc. 
Summarizing the same human rights, US President Franklin D Roosevelt called for a world based on "four essential human freedoms" (State of the Union address, 1941):
  • I. "The first is freedom of speech and expression" – freedoms civil, political, philosophical, and artistic
  • II. "The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way" – freedom of conscience and religious belief and practice
  • III. "The third is freedom from want" – right to food, clothing, shelter, and livelihood. 
  • IV. "The fourth is freedom from fear" – right to live free of warfare and threats of deadly weapons, a human right to disarmament.
In his epochal call for a Second Bill of Rights (State of the Union address, 1944), President Roosevelt further elaborated the human rights to social justice which have become enshrined in many national constitutions, pieces of legislation, and international declarations since, including the UN Universal Declaration and the European Social Charter. Thanks to the activism of many people of conscience around the world, these basic human rights are also increasingly being recognized as a matter of justice in global terms – a preservation of 'the commons' – our common planet, land, sea, air, water, resources, biodiversity, our humanity, and our future in our children, etc. 

It is not surprising that the profit-based demands of a market-based economy, particularly as incarnate in multinational corporations, are often in deadly conflict with the basic rights of justice (including individual free enterprise), leading to the growing worldwide gap between rich and poor, staggering 'third world' debt, and endless armament and conflicts to defend those business interests. Corporate practices are defended by 'free-market' or 'laissez-faire' ideology (also a product of the 18th century) which argues that business in the marketplace 'left free' of public regulation and obligation provides what is best for society through 'natural' economic laws. This ideology is full of contradictions, both logically and ethically. 

I. There is no laissez-faire. The very foundations of a capital-market economy, (a) property, particularly in its corporate form and (b) freedom of contract, are of necessity secondary to fundamental human rights, and both are created and maintained by public law. In fact, the corporate adherents of 'laissez-faire' do not really object to government intervention in the economy at all, as can be seen by their constant lobbying for government 'subsidies,' tax incentives and loopholes, against public oversight, for public largess and favorable treatment in the form of 'sweetheart' government contracts and treaties empowering them in effect to overwhelm small local businesses. Unfortunately, the corruption is nearly constant because of the endless pursuit of a 'corporate welfare state' and exemptions from just public duties to employees and to the health of the environment and communities. Corporations too often operate as if the public interest is utterly irrelevant and may be trampled by their own private interests and that of their stockholders. Of them and their corrupt consorts in government, it has been well-written,

"Your princes are rebellious, 
and companions of thieves; 
Everyone loves bribes, 
And follows after rewards. 
They do not defend the fatherless, 
Nor does the cause of the widow come before them" 
(Isa. 1:23)

In summary:

  • I. There is no laissez-faire: No one can really object to state intervention in the market, because such intervention is ubiquitous. One may disagree about the details of the interventions and whether they are just or unjust, but the intervention is inevitably present.
  • II. Justice and pragmatism: Human rights must hold property laws in subordination: Since state legal intervention in markets is ubiquitous, from the standpoint of justice and human rights, the question becomes pragmatic and utilitarian: What kind of regulation or intervention is in the best interest of the public, improving human lives and furthering human freedom (Sunstein, 2004)? Property laws are often at odds with fundamental human rights and must give way to them. 
What have various thought leaders had to say about these two points:

I. There is no laissez-faire: The clearest thinkers have long recognized that laissez-faire neither has, does, nor can exist, it is pure mercantilist utopianism:

  • Jeremy Bentham, utilitarian philosopher: Although a strong believer in private property, he recognized that "there is no natural property.... property is entirely the creature of law" and "can only be the work of law." "It is only from the law alone that I can enclose a field and give myself to its cultivation, in the distant hope of the harvest.... property and law are born and must die together. Before the laws there was no property; take away the laws, all property ceases" (Principles of the Civil Code, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 1898. Edinburgh, Scotland: Simpkin, Marshall, 1: 307-308). 
  • Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., US Supreme Court Justice: "Property, a creation of law, does not arise from value, although exchangeable – a matter of fact." Like the legal realists of the 20th century, Bentham had recognized that "ownership rights are legal creations" and "economic value does not predate law; it is created by law. All of this, wrote Holmes, was simply 'a matter of fact'" (Sunstein, 2004; emphasis original).
  • Robert Hale, prominent economist (1922a): "The dependence of present economic conditions, in part at least, on the government's past policy concerning the distribution of the public domain [e.g., massive public railroad land grants that made many of the great 19th century private fortunes, etc.], must be obvious. Laissez-faire is a utopian dream which never has been and never can be realized" (American Bar Assn. Journal 8: 638). 
  • Robert Hale, prominent economist (1922b): He showed "that property rights were in effect a delegation of public power" (Sunstein, 2004) in the illustration of the 'owner' of a manufacturing plant who has "a privilege to operate the plant, plus a privilege not to operate it, plus a right to keep others from operating, plus a power to acquire all rights of ownership in the products.... [Ownership] power is a power to release a pressure which the law of property exerts on the liberty of others. If the pressure is great, the owner may be able to to compel the others to pay him a big price for their release; if the pressure is slight, he can collect but a small income from his ownership. In either case, he is paid for releasing a pressure by the government – the law. The law has delegated to him a discretionary power over the rights and duties of others" ("Rate making and the revision of the property concept," Columbia Law Review 22: 209, 214; emphasis added). 
  • An unsigned law student essay (1935): "Justification for this purported refusal to supervise the ethics of the market place is sought in doctrines of laissez-faire.... In general, the freedom from regulation postulated by laissez-faire adherents is demonstrably nonexistent and virtually inconceivable. Bargaining power exists only because of government protection of the property rights bargained, and is properly subject to government control" (Note, Columbia Law Review 35: 1090).
  • Walter Lippmann (1937): "While the theorists were talking about laissez-faire, men were buying and selling legal titles to property, were chartering corporations, were making and enforcing contracts, were suing for damages. In these transactions, by means of which the work of society was carried on, the state was implicated at every turn" (An Inquiry into the Principles of the Good Society, New York: Greenwood, reprinted 1973).
  • Lester Ward: "Those who denounce state intervention are the ones who most frequently and successfully invoke it. The cry of laissez-faire mainly goes up from the ones who, if really 'let alone,' would instantly lose their wealth-absorbing power" ("Plutocracy and paternalism" quoted in Fine, Laissez Faire and the General Welfare State).
II. Justice and pragmatism: Human rights must hold property laws in subordination: Declarations of US presidents, economists, and American founding fathers
  • Lord Chancellor, British judge in Vernon v. Bethell, Eden 2 (1762): Recognizing the link between political justice and socio-economic justice, he wrote, "Necessitous men are not, truly speaking, free men; but, to answer a present emergency, will submit to any terms that the crafty may impose on them" (Cited by Pres. Franklin Roosevelt in his epochal "Second Bill of Rights" address, January, 1944). 
  • John Locke (1632-1704), English Philosopher: "As Justice gives every Man a Title [i.e., a right] to the product of his honest Industry, and the fair Acquisitions of his Ancestors descended to him, so Charity gives every man a Title [i.e., a right] to so much of another's plenty, as will keep him from extream want, where he has no means to subsist otherwise" (Two treatises on government, bk. 1, ch. 4; emphasis added).
  • Thomas Jefferson (1743-1846): "Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise [i.e., a progressive income tax]. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right. The earth is given as a common stock for man to labor and live on [cf. the idea of 'the (shared) commons' in English common law]" (The papers of Thomas Jefferson, 8: 681-683; emphasis added).
  • James Madison (1751-1836): In defending against "the evil of parties" Madison seemed to advocate "a clear link between elimination of poverty and the preconditions for democracy" (Sunstein, 2004) by: "1. By establishing a political equality among all. 2. By withholding unnecessary opportunities from a few, to increase the inequality of property, by an immoderate, and especially an unmerited, accumulation of riches. 3. By the silent operation of laws, which, without violating the rights of property, reduce extreme wealth to a state of mediocrity, and raise extreme indigence toward a state of comfort" (The Papers of James Madison, ed. R. Rutland & W. Rachal, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1975; emphasis added).
  • Thomas Paine (1737-1809): In defending the rights of mankind, by advocating public employment for the unemployed, social security for employees allowing retirement at 60, public assistance for poor families sufficient to raise and educate their children, public benefits for recently married couples and for mothers, Paine argued that these protections are "not of the nature of a charity, but of a right" and elaborated (later in 1794) that they are "not charity but a right, not bounty but justice" (The Rights of Man, Vol. 1, 1791; Vol. 2, 1792; cit. Sunstein, 2004; emphasis added).
  • Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1932): "Our Republican [Party] leaders tell us economic laws – sacred, inviolable, unchangeable – cause panics which no one could prevent. But while they prate of economic laws, men and women are starving. We must lay hold of the fact that economic laws are not made by nature. They are made by human beings" and later, "I assert that modern society, acting through its Government, owes the definite obligation to prevent the starvation or dire want of any of its fellow men and women who try to maintain themselves but cannot" (Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1: 788; emphasis added). 
  • Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1936): The 18th century American Revolution was fought for political liberty and rights and "freedom from the tyranny of political autocracy – from the eighteenth-century royalists who held special privileges from the crown" who wished "to perpetuate their privilege." In the 20th century, there persists an "economic tyranny" where for "too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real.... The royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom was the business of government, but they have maintained that economic slavery is nobody's business.... they denied that the government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live" (President's speech before the 1936 Democratic National Convention, Essential Franklin Delano Roosevelt, p. 114; emphasis added). 
  • Norris-LaGuardia Act preamble: In defending the workers' right to organize, NLA recognized government's role in creating forms of ownership: "Whereas under prevailing economic conditions, developed with the aid of governmental authority for owners of property to organize in the corporate and other forms of ownership, the individual worker is commonly helpless to exercise actual liberty of contract and to protect his freedom of labor, and thereby to obtain acceptable terms and conditions of employment" (Emphasis added).
  • Amartya Sen, economist, Nobel laureate: Famine does not result from lack of food supply but from social policy choices underwritten legally which ultimately decide who is entitled to eat. "...market forces, can be seen operating through a system of legal relations (ownership rights, contractual obligations, legal exchanges, etc.). The law stands between food availability and food entitlement. Starvation deaths can reflect legality with a vengeance" (Poverty and Famines, 1980; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; emphasis added). Far from falling out of heaven as the inevitable results of nature, "both famines and entrenched hunger are artifacts of identifiable social policies" (Sunstein, 2004, summarizing Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen, 1991, Hunger and Public Action; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).

The mercantilist, 'laissez-faire' economics philosophy (now couched in terms of international 'free trade', i.e., making transnational the oppression of the poor and exploitation of the environment on God's earth) of today is very similar to Jesus' description of slavery to mammon (wealth and materialism). "And because lawlessness [anomia] will abound, the love [agapé, i.e., God-style sharing] of many will grow cold. But he who endures to the end shall be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come" (Matt. 24:12-14). The one enduring to the end and finding salvation, will reject lawlessness and persevere in the practice of God-style sharing (agapé) toward all, especially the most destitute and vulnerable. This will be seen to be not as a matter of 'charity' or 'bounty' but as our duty because of the rights of our fellow humans. To preach a gospel of justification and salvation devoid of this ethical consequence is to preach falsely and in vain (James 2).

John and Jesus – announcing-enacting the Kingdom. To see in Mark's account a "new Exodus" of Christianity from Judaism (possibly cf. Watts, 1997) sounds suspiciously anachronistic, flavored more like post-Hadrian (135 CE) Christian anti-semitism rather than anything John or Jesus did. Instead, John and Jesus were announcing-enacting a "new conquest" of Canaan, the Promised Land, completely unlike the stories of genocidal wars found in Joshua. John the ascetic wilderness prophet was leading Israel across Jordan in repentance! Jesus the itinerant party-goer was leading the non-violent conquest by God-style "sharing abundantly." Their contrasting actions began the Kingdom of God! According to Q, Jesus himself said so.

The fasting John and the feasting Jesus
(Source: Q)

Luke
Matthew
16:16The law and the prophets were until John. Since that time the kingdom of God has been announced, and everyone is violently forcing their way into it. 11:12And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven has been breaking in with violence, and violent men attempt to seize it by force.
13For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
14And if you are willing to admit it, he is Elijah who is to come.
15Anyone with two good ears had better listen!
7:31And the Lord said, "What do people of this generation remind me of? What are they like? 
  • 32They are like children sitting in the marketplace and calling out to one another:
    • 'We played the flute for you, and you didn't dance
      • We sang a dirge, and you didn't weep.'
      • 33For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, 'He is demented!'
    • 34The Son of man has come eating and drinking, and you say, 'Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a crony of tax collectors and sinners!'
  • 35But wisdom is vindicated by all her children. (Citing what has been called 'Lady Wisdom,' i.e., God's primordial wisdom poetically personified in Prov. 8)
16What does this generation remind me of? 
  •  It is like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to their companions: 
    • 'We played the flute for you, and you didn't dance
      • We sang a dirge, and you didn't lament.'
      • 18For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, 'He is demented.' 
    • 19The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, 'Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a crony of tax collectors and sinners!'
  • But wisdom is vindicated by her works. (Citing what has been called 'Lady Wisdom,' i.e., God's primordial wisdom poetically personified in Prov. 8)

The contrasting styles of John and Jesus correspond to the stark privation of the wilderness wandering followed by the promised "land flowing with milk and honey." "Assuredly, I tell you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or lands, for my sake and the gospel's, who shall not receive a hundredfold now in this time – houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions – and in the age to come, eternal life" (Mark 10:30). For the destitute and landless refuse of Herod's Greco-Roman kingdom that was hope. "Be warmed and filled" has never been enough, any more than 'pie in the sky, in the sweet by and by.' No wonder imperial Christianity (post the 2nd century CE) stirred by 'the love of money' found neo-Platonism so congenial, and so began, not to be persecuted, but to persecute, theologically and ecclesiologically armed with a foreign anthropology, soteriology, eschatology, and christology. Who really desires to listen to that Galilean peasant?
 

III. Precursors of 'the Kingdom of God'

What Jesus of Nazareth announced-enacted of the universal 'Kingdom of God' rested on emerging ideas within a long historical background: Near Eastern law and temple, Torah and tabernacle, Prophets and wisdom Writings, ancient creation stories and ultimately the widespread and prehistoric traditions-idea of only one Deity behind and beyond the universe, who created it all.

In the Hebrew scriptures – the Torah, the prophets, and the wisdom writings – the highest practical ethical claims made upon the Covenant people are centered in justice. As we noted justice-righteousness is not only retributive but distributive. Righteousness is active justice judicially so found before God and man. Justice-righteousness is most explicitly defined as impartiality, generosity, defending the cause of and providing relief for the vulnerable and indigent – the poor, the needy, the fatherless / orphan, the widow, and the stranger.

We turn in broad outline to some of the historical sources of the ancient world-view inherited by Jesus and his contemporaries, in order to highlight how Jesus' ethics built upon that world-view.
 

In the beginning was one God

The prehistoric idea of one Deity who originated the world, and rules heaven and earth is apparently very old (Schmidt, 1912; 1931; 1933) and according to anthropologists widespread and perhaps universal in the early history of many cultures around the world (Armstrong, 1993) including those which have since adopted the worship of many gods or other spirits (polytheism and animism). Unlike the later pantheons of gods, the one Deity (often called by anthropologists, the high God or sky God) was considered to be inexpressible and beyond description and so was not depicted by image or effigy and did not have a temple cult or mediating priesthood.

The characteristics of the one supreme God who is nearly ubiquitous, having been observed in indigenous cultures from the Arctic to Tierra del Fuego, to Africa, and to Australia, including the pre-Islamic religion of the Arab tribes:
  • He is associated with or resides above the skies (and with the blessings of rain and sunshine, etc.)
  • He is thought of as a "Father" or "Creator" and dwells alone (all One) without wife or family or relatives
  • He rules over all (including other gods and spirits), and beyond the tribe
  • He cannot be expressed by anything physical, so is almost never depicted in effigy, and is instead worshipped without cult, priesthood, or shrine
  • He is creator of everything
  • He is eternal (i.e., existed before anything else, and will never cease to be)
  • He is all-knowing and all-powerful
  • He is good and shows how to be good and avoid evil (origin of morality)
  • He is the judge of every person's life
  • Humans are alienated from Him because of some misdemeanor in the distant past
  • His memory often persists but He has largely been supplanted by other more accessible gods, spirits, or numina which are associated with more immediate roles in tribal life, e.g., sun, moon, earth, sea, sky, winds, rain, forest, and animals. 
(On Schmidt, 1912; 1931; 1933; Schmidt summary; for more and also;
Eldiade, 1958; Smart, 1969; Armstrong, 1993)

The oldest historical records (23rd-21st centuries BCE) of the idea of one transcendant God beyond the universe are found in cuneiform tablets from Ebla (Heeren, 2000) more than 15 centuries before the final recensions of our Hebrew Bible. El, the high or sky God of Canaan is also alluded to in the Patriarchal sagas in Genesis as El of Abraham, El Elyon, El Shaddai, the Terror or Kinsman of Isaac, the Mighty One of Jacob, El of Beth-El, El of Peni-El, El of Isra-El, El of Ishma-El, El-roi) and elsewhere in the poetic writings of the Hebrew Scriptures (e.g., Ps. 19:1-4; Job; etc.). In almost every culture the idea of a supreme Being corresponding to the human sense of the unseen and the transcendant, a sense of presence behind the world of appearances, mana to south Pacific islanders, numina to the ancient Romans (see Rudolf Otto, The Idea of the Holy) has been eclipsed by more immediate spirits and gods. Often the sun, moon, planets, earth, sea, sky, winds, rain, or even animals and birds came to be personalized and worshipped as gods. With the rise of city-states, a long and complicated pantheon of gods reflecting all the foibles of humankind developed in the Near East.

As we will discuss more later, the creation accounts in the Hebrew Bible are almost all modeled after and a monotheist polemic against already-extant creation myths (Kikawada & Quinn, 1985; Christian, 2003; Hasel, 1974). There is one however that may well reflect the remnants of primordial monotheism or deism found by Professor Schmidt in many indigenous cultures around the world. There are also some truncated fragments interspersed.

Do biblical and Near Eastern creation stories point to a primordial belief in one supreme Deity?

Hebrew creation stories
Near Eastern antecedents and cognate myths
Genesis 1 – Creation week: Dividing, forming, and filling Atrahasis
Genesis 2 – Mankind and the garden in Eden: "And every shrub of the field was not yet on the earth, and every herb of the field had not yet sprung up, for YHWH God had not yet sent rain on the earth, and there was no human to to till the ground, and a mist arose from the earth and watered the face of all the ground. And YHWH God formed Human humus from the ground, and blew into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul. And YHWH God planted a garden in Eden to the east, and there put the Human He had formed...." (2:5-8) Babylonian Epic of Creation: "A reed had not come forth, A tree had not been created, A house had not been made, A city had not been made, All the lands were sea, Then Eridu was made...." (Oliphant, 1992; 21st century BCE, Fiero, 1992)
Genesis 1-11 – Primordial creation and flood cycle Atrahasis
Job 26 – God triumphed and continues to triumph over the powers of chaos, destruction, sheol, and the primordial sea god (Yam), and the primordial serpent of chaose Ugaritic Baal-Yam story; multiple allusions
Job 28 – The primordial search for wisdom by man and declared by God (a judgment) References to God's triumph over chaos (many ancient Near Eastern cognages) and destruction as well as allusions to precious materials, especially gold and also to Cush (sometimes equated with Ethiopia) Cf. Gen. 2
Job 38-40 – "Where were you?" cosmology God's building of the world and triumph over the proud primordial sea (Ba'al-Yam myth), over distruction, setting out the universe and creating Leviathan (usually a mythological opposer of creation, synonymous with chaos, etc.)
Psalm 104 – YHWH the Creator rides forth to conquer chaos and the abyss, and so makes a habitable world Multiple allusions to ANE myths of gods conquering chaos in creation (Ugaritic, Babylonian, etc.)
Proverbs 8 – Wisdom (with Prudence, Knowledge) personified as Lady Wisdom created by YHWH before His creation and subduing of chaos by order, and governing the affairs of earth Allusions to conquering of chaos, but in an almost naturalistic way. Jesus may have alluded to Lady Wisdom of Prov. 8 in his oracular verse about the fasting John and the feasting Son of man (Q): "Wisdom is justified by her children"
One creation tradition fragment linked explicitly to the one Deity, repeatedly appears embedded in different contexts, and has no ancient Near Eastern mythological parallels:
  • "(God) is wise in heart and mighty in strength.... He commands the sun, and it does not rise; He seals off the stars; He alone stretches out the heavens, and treads on the waves of the sea;" (Job 9:4-8).
  • "Bless YHWH, O my soul! O YHWH my God, You are very great: You are clothed with honor and majesty, Who covers (Yourself) with light as (with) a garment, Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain" (Ps. 104:1-2).
  • "Have you not known? Have you not heard? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? (It is) He who sits above the circle of the earth, And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers, Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, And spreads them out like a tent to dwell in" (Isa. 40:21-22).
  • "Thus says EL YHWH, Who created the heavens and stretched them out, Who spread forth the earth and that which comes from it, Who gives breath to the people on it, And breath to those who walk on it:" (Isa. 42:5).
  • "Thus says YHWH, your Redeemer and He who formed you from the womb: 'I am YHWH, who makes all things, stretching out the heavens, I alone; spreading abroad the earth, who was with Me?'" (Isa. 44:24)
  • "I have made the earth, and created man on it. I – My hands – stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded" (Isa. 45:12).
  • "I, (even) I, (am) He who comforts you. Who are you that you should be afraid of a man who will die, and of the son of a man who will be made like grass? And you forget YHWH your Maker, Who stretched out the heavens And laid the foundations of the earth; You have feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, when he has prepared to destroy. And where is the fury of the oppressor?" (Isa. 51:12-13)
  • "YHWH of hosts has sworn by Himself: 'Surely I will fill you with men, as with locusts, And they shall lift up a shout against you.' He has made the earth by His power; He has established the world by His wisdom, and stretched out the heavens by His understanding." (Jer. 51:14-15)
  • "The burden of the word of YHWH against Israel. Thus says YHWH, Who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the breath of man within him:" (Zech. 12:1).
  • Cf. "Indeed My hand has laid the foundation of the earth, and My right hand has extended out the heavens; when I call to them, They stand up together." (Isa. 48:13)
  • Cf. "Who has measured the waters in the hollow of His hand, measured heaven with a span And calculated the dust of the earth in a measure? Weighed the mountains in scales And the hills in a balance?" (Isa. 40:12) – Creation possibly presented as a work of just judgment by God
   “The reference to the ‘stretching out the heavens by Himself’ is the only oral fragment among all these [Job 9] that does not have Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Babylonian, or Ugaritic mythological cognates. Could this be older than any of the above Near Eastern civilizations and their traditions? If so, this may be a tantalizing fragment of an oral tradition lingering on the very verge – the very interface – between where the earliest historical recognition or history fades into Near Eastern prehistory. As such it would be the oldest part of the Biblical tradition. It has no literary precursors or mythological cognates in any of the known sources of Genesis. Eleven other times it appears in the Old Testament, once in the wisdom writings (Ps. 104:2) and 10 times in the prophets both pre-exilic and post-exilic, mostly in Second Isaiah, but also in Jeremiah and Zechariah. In every one of these cases, as in the book of Job which provides ancient oral wisdom and mythological tradition as a context, it can be isolated from the various immediate contexts in which it is embedded, sometimes with embellishments [‘like a tent to dwell in’ or ‘like a curtain’]. By referring to One who ‘alone stretched out the heavens,’ this oral fragment may be a remnant of tradition from the legendary primordial monotheism....” (Greer, 1997, Job a translation, unpublished). 

(Nearby star in the foreground, but far away galaxies beyond!)

The seemingly natural and almost universal notion of a supreme Deity originating and transcending the universe is so powerful and important to our story, that we will return to it again.
 

Historical introduction – The making of the Book and its ethics

The legal codes and ethics of ancient Israel were the result of a long process of historical development, and involved oracular traditions and eventually the final written version of what is our Hebrew Bible.

Law as it began in the ancient Near East. (Ehrlich, 1993). There are several terms for law: Torah = instruction; choq  = statute; mishpat = ordinance; mishvah =  commandment; dabar = word; (oral Torah = mishnah, etc.). It was once thought that Israel's legal and moral traditions were unique in the ancient world, but now we know that this is not the case. There were many precedents, especially found in cuneiform tablets from Mesopotamia. (For more on ancient law traditions, see Fiero, 1992).

Ancient le